Scan to download
BTC $79,104.27 -2.79%
ETH $2,225.51 -3.16%
BNB $674.37 -0.84%
XRP $1.43 -5.91%
SOL $89.50 -3.84%
TRX $0.3519 -0.76%
DOGE $0.1132 -2.65%
ADA $0.2611 -4.91%
BCH $425.75 -2.77%
LINK $10.08 -5.19%
HYPE $44.87 +0.48%
AAVE $93.10 -6.93%
SUI $1.10 -8.74%
XLM $0.1545 -6.71%
ZEC $522.84 -3.49%
BTC $79,104.27 -2.79%
ETH $2,225.51 -3.16%
BNB $674.37 -0.84%
XRP $1.43 -5.91%
SOL $89.50 -3.84%
TRX $0.3519 -0.76%
DOGE $0.1132 -2.65%
ADA $0.2611 -4.91%
BCH $425.75 -2.77%
LINK $10.08 -5.19%
HYPE $44.87 +0.48%
AAVE $93.10 -6.93%
SUI $1.10 -8.74%
XLM $0.1545 -6.71%
ZEC $522.84 -3.49%

hearing

U.S. judge postpones hearing on Aave's application to unfreeze $71 million in stolen ETH

U.S. Judge Margaret M. Garnett in New York postponed the ruling on Aave's emergency application on Wednesday, which aims to unfreeze $71 million in ETH related to the Kelp DAO hacking incident, and requested both parties to submit supplemental briefs before the hearing on June 5. Aave is attempting to reclaim the $71 million in ETH frozen on Arbitrum to assist in the asset recovery efforts from this hacking incident—Kelp DAO suffered losses of up to $293 million from the hack, making it one of the most severe security incidents in the DeFi space this year.However, the U.S. law firm Gerstein Harrow LLP submitted a restraining order to the court in early May, claiming that its client has rights to the aforementioned funds. Aave then filed an emergency motion to lift the freeze, warning that if the funds are not released in a timely manner, it could lead to user liquidations and potentially impact the entire DeFi market. Judge Garnett noted in her ruling that Aave failed to adequately explain how user funds would incur "compound losses" if the restraining order remained in place. She also acknowledged the complexity of the case, the risks faced by the victims, and requested both parties to provide supplemental statements on six key issues, including: whether the hacking transaction is subject to New York state sanctuary principles, the legal distinctions between fraud and theft and what rights the hacker has over the stolen assets, which laws apply to determine the priority of claims for frozen assets, whether constructive trusts are an appropriate remedy, and whether Aave or Arbitrum can identify individual victims and proportionally return assets. Both parties must submit supplemental briefs by May 22.Meanwhile, the overall compensation work for Kelp DAO is progressing. Kelp and Aave announced on Tuesday that the rsETH held by the hacker has been destroyed on Arbitrum, and approximately $278 million in loss tokens will be restored within the next two weeks through the funds of the Aave Recovery Guardian multi-signature wallet. Once the relevant smart contracts are reactivated, all functions of rsETH will return to normal.

Plume's General Counsel attended a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives, calling for the inclusion of tokenized securities within the existing regulatory framework

According to the official blog, Plume Network's General Counsel Salman Banaei stated at a hearing held by the U.S. House Financial Services Committee that tokenized securities should not be viewed as a completely new asset class, nor should new rules or exemptions be created for them.He argued that regulation should be driven by the economic nature and risks of financial products, rather than the technology used, and thus should incorporate new technological realities into the existing regulatory framework through targeted amendments to current regulations.Salman pointed out that utilizing public blockchains and on-chain compliance tools (such as Plume's built-in protocol-level anti-money laundering screening) can significantly enhance market transparency, reduce costs, and decrease reliance on intermediaries while maintaining or even exceeding existing regulatory standards.Finally, Salman issued a warning: the competition for global tokenized infrastructure is accelerating, with regions like Hong Kong, Singapore, and the UAE actively positioning themselves. If the U.S. falls behind in regulation due to policy uncertainty, it risks losing its leadership position in the digital transformation of global capital markets, allowing this strategic opportunity to shift to foreign competitors with different geopolitical objectives.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.