BTC $63,604.00 -0.62%
ETH $1,778.84 -1.25%
BNB $577.36 -1.58%
XRP $1.11 -3.20%
SOL $80.48 -2.24%
TRX $0.3316 +0.62%
DOGE $0.0742 -3.48%
ADA $0.1751 -4.94%
BCH $239.91 -0.94%
LINK $7.86 -2.41%
HYPE $69.53 -2.42%
AAVE $89.20 -5.14%
SUI $0.7298 -2.95%
XLM $0.1892 -5.53%
ZEC $484.50 +6.58%
BTC $63,604.00 -0.62%
ETH $1,778.84 -1.25%
BNB $577.36 -1.58%
XRP $1.11 -3.20%
SOL $80.48 -2.24%
TRX $0.3316 +0.62%
DOGE $0.0742 -3.48%
ADA $0.1751 -4.94%
BCH $239.91 -0.94%
LINK $7.86 -2.41%
HYPE $69.53 -2.42%
AAVE $89.20 -5.14%
SUI $0.7298 -2.95%
XLM $0.1892 -5.53%
ZEC $484.50 +6.58%

china

All
Article
Flash

Goldman Sachs released a report on China's AI computing power, predicting that by 2026, the market share of domestic chips will exceed 50%

According to the Goldman Sachs report on "China's AI Computing Power" disclosed by P Equity Research, China is accelerating the construction of a national computing power network, with related infrastructure projects expected to attract 7 trillion yuan in investment by 2026. In the next five years, investment in data centers is projected to reach about 2 trillion yuan. Currently, funds and technology are being massively transferred to western computing power hubs, while data centers in first-tier cities are transforming to focus on ultra-low latency computing, edge nodes, and AI inference. Although GW-level clusters with over 100,000 chips remain scarce domestically, in typical GW-level computing power parks, workloads are primarily composed of inference, which accounts for more than half, as well as training and full-stack R&D.The report predicts that by 2026, the market share of domestically produced AI acceleration chips is expected to exceed 50%. Among them, Huawei and Alibaba's Pingtouge lead the domestic camp with shares of 20% and 7%, respectively, but Nvidia currently maintains overall market dominance with a 55% share. In terms of cost and performance, domestic chips have capital expenditures on IT power consumption that are 40% to 50% lower than imported chips, but due to performance gaps, their capital expenditures per unit of computing power are 2 to 4 times that of imported chips, and the computing power generated per unit of power consumption is only 10% to 30% of that of imported chips. Additionally, the daily average token output of Huawei's 910B/910C servers is about one-sixth to one-third of that of Nvidia's H800, resulting in significantly lower API profit margins based on that hardware compared to peers using Nvidia hardware.

Taiwan, China has officially established a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency through the "Virtual Asset Service Act."

According to The Block, the Legislative Yuan of Taiwan has passed the "Virtual Asset Service Act" in its third reading. The bill has been submitted to Taiwan's regional leader Lai Ching-te for signing, and the implementation date is expected to be announced within 10 days.The core points of the bill are as follows:• Licensing requirements: Virtual asset service providers must apply for a license from the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC). Platforms that have completed AML registration have a 12-month application period and a 21-month approval period.• Stablecoin regulation: Issuing or managing stablecoins requires dual approval from both the central bank and the FSC, and sufficient reserves must be maintained.• Compliance requirements: Covering aspects such as cybersecurity, customer asset segregation, and internal controls.• Criminal penalties: Illegal operations can result in a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison and fines of up to NT$100 million (approximately US$3.14 million); market manipulation in the crypto space can lead to a maximum sentence of 10 years and fines of up to NT$200 million (approximately US$6.28 million).Industry insiders point out that crypto companies previously operating in legal gray areas will no longer be able to rely on regulatory ambiguity. Traditional financial institutions will also be allowed to apply for VASP licenses in the future, and existing crypto companies may face increased competitive pressure.

The Shanghai procuratorate in China has cracked a cross-border virtual currency exchange case, with the amount involved exceeding 200 million yuan

According to the disclosure from the People's Procuratorate of Jing'an District, Shanghai, recently, the court prosecuted a certain Li for suspected illegal business operations in a criminal gang that used virtual currency for cross-border money laundering and illegal foreign exchange. On June 10, the case was heard in court and a verdict was announced on the spot, marking a conclusion to a series of illegal business operations spanning three years and involving over 200 million yuan. In July 2024, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange discovered abnormal clues regarding Company Z using virtual currency to transfer assets for domestic clients during routine monitoring, and subsequently referred the case to the public security authorities for handling.Investigations revealed that Company Z was registered overseas in 2019, promoting itself under the guise of a "private bank" and developing a virtual banking app to create a facade of legitimacy, but it had not obtained the necessary foreign exchange business operation license in China and was essentially engaged in illegal foreign exchange activities. The gang targeted high-net-worth individuals with funding needs for overseas property purchases, immigration, and studying abroad, using intermediaries to attract clients, with customer managers, traders, and customer service personnel facilitating the currency exchange process. Clients purchased virtual currency from virtual currency exchangers with renminbi and transferred it to Company Z's overseas virtual wallet, after which the gang exchanged the virtual currency for foreign currency abroad and transferred it to the clients' designated overseas accounts. There was no actual cross-border flow of funds; instead, settlements were made through domestic and foreign capital pools, with Company Z charging a 3% currency exchange service fee and paying intermediaries a 0.5% commission.A total of nine individuals have been brought to justice in this case, while one main suspect is still under investigation. After review, the relevant personnel collectively violated national laws by illegally buying and selling foreign exchange, disrupting financial order, and the circumstances were serious or particularly serious, warranting criminal liability for illegal business operations. The court sentenced five individuals, including Gao and Li, to prison terms ranging from six years to two years and six months, and imposed fines ranging from 1.5 million yuan to 300,000 yuan; for Chen, Huang, and four others, due to lighter criminal circumstances, relatively smaller amounts involved, and voluntary confession, the procuratorial authority made a decision of relative non-prosecution according to the law.

XAUT announced that the Greater China region node will be integrated into the global mainnet from June 15 to 20, simultaneously connecting WEFI payments with the DEO digital banking ecosystem

The official announcement from the XAUT ecosystem states that the Greater China region node will officially complete its network connection from June 15 to 20, fully integrating into the global node network, simultaneously connecting the WEFI payment system and DEO Banking digital banking, completing the critical expansion of global financial infrastructure.The core focus of this ecological upgrade is on three major tracks: global stablecoin payments, on-chain asset clearing and settlement, and one-stop digital banking services. The dual asset pledge system for USDC and USD1 will be launched simultaneously, with multiple measures running in parallel to comprehensively optimize the underlying liquidity of the ecosystem, user asset allocation efficiency, and cross-border payment flow capabilities.According to official disclosures, the network upgrade of the Greater China region node will link with Helio Protocol's global investment ecosystem resources, implement XAUT gold stablecoin payment scenarios, diversify digital financial services, and establish a global node collaborative operation system, continuously improving the underlying architecture of the global stablecoin payment network, laying a solid foundation for the digitization of gold assets, cross-border compliant payments, and the large-scale implementation of on-chain banking services.

The second trial of the 660,000 yuan virtual currency theft case in Wuhan, China, has been revised: the main culprit was sentenced to ten years and six months in prison, and the amount stolen was determined based on the actual payment cost incurred by the victim

According to the "Procuratorial Daily," Lin, Zeng, and Dai conspired to use virtual currency trading as a pretext. During the trading process, they secretly filmed the victim's digital wallet private key and, after the virtual currency was credited, secretly logged into the victim's wallet to reverse the transaction, transferring the related virtual currency back to their controlled accounts. The three committed the crime three times, causing the victim a total economic loss of 660,000 yuan.The first-instance court held that in the absence of a clear judicial interpretation regarding the valuation method of virtual currency and sentencing standards, it was inappropriate to directly determine the amount involved as particularly huge based on the victim's purchase amount of 660,000 yuan. Therefore, they sentenced the three based on "other serious circumstances," imposing prison terms ranging from eight years to five years and six months, along with fines. The Hanyang District Procuratorate of Wuhan City in Hubei Province subsequently filed an appeal, which was supported by the Wuhan City Procuratorate.The prosecution argued that the first-instance court applied the law incorrectly and imposed an excessively light sentence. Prosecutor Dai Wentao of the Wuhan City Procuratorate stated that in the case where the victim had a clear loss amount to refer to, it was contradictory and legally erroneous to claim that the value of virtual currency could not be determined. In judicial practice, using the resale price and transaction price as the basis for determining the amount of theft has become mainstream, and determining the value of virtual currency based on the actual cost paid by the victim has factual, legal, and practical basis.The Intermediate Court of Wuhan accepted the prosecution's opinion in the second instance, revoked the corresponding content of the original judgment, and changed the determination of the theft amount to particularly huge. It sentenced the principal offender Lin to ten years and six months in prison for theft, and sentenced the accomplices Zeng and Dai to eight years in prison each, along with fines.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.