Scan to download
BTC $79,062.48 -2.67%
ETH $2,221.76 -3.08%
BNB $672.84 -0.85%
XRP $1.43 -4.07%
SOL $89.24 -3.40%
TRX $0.3517 -0.47%
DOGE $0.1135 -1.80%
ADA $0.2612 -3.63%
BCH $426.19 -2.36%
LINK $10.07 -4.16%
HYPE $44.14 -0.11%
AAVE $92.85 -5.91%
SUI $1.09 -7.67%
XLM $0.1543 -5.26%
ZEC $516.22 -7.39%
BTC $79,062.48 -2.67%
ETH $2,221.76 -3.08%
BNB $672.84 -0.85%
XRP $1.43 -4.07%
SOL $89.24 -3.40%
TRX $0.3517 -0.47%
DOGE $0.1135 -1.80%
ADA $0.2612 -3.63%
BCH $426.19 -2.36%
LINK $10.07 -4.16%
HYPE $44.14 -0.11%
AAVE $92.85 -5.91%
SUI $1.09 -7.67%
XLM $0.1543 -5.26%
ZEC $516.22 -7.39%

usat

On-chain analysis questions the U.S. accusations of "Iranian cryptocurrency assets," with some seized wallets possibly related to actors from other countries

According to Cointelegraph, Nominis analysis indicates that some of the "Iran-related" crypto wallets recently seized and frozen by the U.S. OFAC may not exhibit on-chain behavior characteristics consistent with the past operational patterns of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), suggesting the involvement of other state-level actors.Previously, the U.S. Treasury stated that over $340 million, totaling nearly $500 million in Iran-related crypto assets, had been frozen in the "Operation Economic Fury." Nominis CEO Snir Levi noted that historically, IRGC-related wallets typically spread funds across multiple addresses, maintain low balances in single wallets, avoid long-term holdings, and employ complex operations to reduce the risk of being frozen; however, the wallets that were seized this time show significant differences in their funding structure and behavior patterns.He believes this raises a critical question: how much of the frozen $340 million in assets is directly controlled by the IRGC, and how much involves broader infrastructures that may even overlap with financial networks of other countries.Levi also pointed out that organizations, including the IRGC and potential state-level actors from China, are continuously upgrading their use of blockchain infrastructure, and traditional static risk control labels are no longer sufficient; behavioral analysis and address clustering are becoming increasingly critical.

Bittensor co-founder responds to Covenant AI's accusations: no authority to suspend subnet emissions, and the amount sold is less than 1% of the investment

Bittensor co-founder Const (@const_reborn) responded on Twitter to recent allegations regarding Covenant AI. Const stated that he has no authority to pause emissions, and that the previous sale of a portion of alpha positions in three subnetworks was because these subnetworks were not operational and were in a high ratio of code destruction state. The impact of this transaction on emissions is consistent with the buying and selling behavior of ordinary TAO holders, and he does not enjoy any special privileges.Regarding management authority, Const clarified that it was Samuel himself who abandoned his Discord channel, and he did not remove his administrator role; he only temporarily restricted his ability to delete posts that honestly criticize and then restored it. Additionally, he emphasized that the scale of the token sell-off was less than 1% of his total investment in the team, and stated that exercising the rights to buy and sell tokens under the dTao system is fundamental to supporting the operation of the system.According to previous reports from ChainCatcher, the main subnetwork developer on Bittensor, Covenant AI, announced its withdrawal from Bittensor. Covenant AI founder Sam Dare stated that the reason Bittensor attracts builders, miners, validators, and investors into this ecosystem is because of its promise not to be controlled by any single entity. But this promise is a lie.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.