BTC $83,494.50 -1.31%
ETH $2,679.57 -0.32%
BNB $764.61 -1.64%
XRP $1.49 -2.45%
SOL $118.78 -3.32%
TRX $0.3358 +0.63%
DOGE $0.0940 -2.91%
ADA $0.2457 -3.50%
BCH $308.43 -7.65%
LINK $15.31 +8.92%
HYPE $88.06 -3.97%
AAVE $148.12 -4.27%
SUI $1.14 -9.02%
XLM $0.2289 +5.94%
ZEC $1,471.70 -8.38%
AAPL $338.46 -0.55%
AMZN $246.58 -1.44%
GOOGL $342.77 -0.39%
MSFT $509.94 -1.44%
META $715.18 -4.72%
NVDA $228.70 +1.47%
TSLA $357.44 -4.30%
SNDK $1,710.69 -4.11%
INTC $115.99 -7.79%
SPCX $145.66 -2.13%
MU $1,053.43 -3.79%
AMD $608.39 -4.12%
BTC $83,494.50 -1.31%
ETH $2,679.57 -0.32%
BNB $764.61 -1.64%
XRP $1.49 -2.45%
SOL $118.78 -3.32%
TRX $0.3358 +0.63%
DOGE $0.0940 -2.91%
ADA $0.2457 -3.50%
BCH $308.43 -7.65%
LINK $15.31 +8.92%
HYPE $88.06 -3.97%
AAVE $148.12 -4.27%
SUI $1.14 -9.02%
XLM $0.2289 +5.94%
ZEC $1,471.70 -8.38%
AAPL $338.46 -0.55%
AMZN $246.58 -1.44%
GOOGL $342.77 -0.39%
MSFT $509.94 -1.44%
META $715.18 -4.72%
NVDA $228.70 +1.47%
TSLA $357.44 -4.30%
SNDK $1,710.69 -4.11%
INTC $115.99 -7.79%
SPCX $145.66 -2.13%
MU $1,053.43 -3.79%
AMD $608.39 -4.12%

gp

All
Article
Flash

Zhao Changpeng: There is no ability to influence the price of the cryptocurrency market; posting and the timing of positive news are purely coincidental

Binance founder Zhao Changpeng stated during the podcast "When Shift Happens" that he remains bullish on Bitcoin but denies having the ability to influence the price of the entire crypto market. Previously, on August 19, when Bitcoin was around the $60,000 range, Zhao Changpeng posted that if one wants their future self to thank today's decisions in two years, immediate action is needed. This post was interpreted by the market as a hint to buy Bitcoin, and in the following days, the crypto market rose by about 20%.Zhao Changpeng responded that he does not have the ability to drive the entire market price. He stated that he has always been bullish on the crypto industry, and almost all of his posts have a bullish tendency, posting 5 to 10 times a day, so it is not surprising that one of his posts coincidentally appeared before positive news.Zhao Changpeng mentioned that about 5 hours after the post was published, Trump gave a relatively positive speech about the crypto industry, mentioning the push for Hyperliquid to enter the U.S. market, but he did not know the content of the speech in advance. He emphasized that if he had any information that could affect the market, he would not post about it. Therefore, the post and the subsequent market rise were merely a coincidence in timing.Regarding the Bitcoin cycle, Zhao Changpeng stated that the crypto market has roughly followed a four-year cycle to date. At that time, some speculated that Bitcoin might bottom out in October, but he believes there is no need to wait until October to express a bullish view.

Zhao Changpeng: Does not oppose Hyperliquid, welcomes more DEX to participate in competition

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao stated during his appearance on the podcast "When Shift Happens" that he does not oppose Hyperliquid and welcomes more centralized and decentralized trading platforms to participate in innovation, as the industry is far from saturated. He estimates that the proportion of the population holding some form of cryptocurrency is about 5% to 15%, but when calculated based on individual wealth allocation, the penetration rate of cryptocurrency assets may be less than 1%, indicating that the industry is still in its early stages.Changpeng Zhao mentioned that some members of the Hyperliquid community are trying to establish their own community by criticizing centralized trading platforms and Binance, but he views this as normal competition and does not oppose the project. Previously, Trump mentioned Hyperliquid, which is very good for the industry. Assets like HYPE, BNB, and Bitcoin could all benefit from the overall growth of the industry.Changpeng Zhao also pointed out that first movers do not necessarily become the long-term biggest winners. Google, Facebook, and Binance were not the first products in their respective fields, and later entrants can often further optimize based on the groundwork laid by the pioneers. Although he holds a significant amount of Binance shares and BNB, the centralized trading platform is just part of his asset allocation; rather than expanding a single platform, he hopes to promote the growth of the entire cryptocurrency industry.

first_img OpenAI is facing a class-action lawsuit, accused of allowing outsourced personnel to read ChatGPT conversations

Two ChatGPT users from California filed a proposed class action lawsuit against OpenAI in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California this month, accusing the company of failing to adequately inform users that their real conversations were being handed over to external contractors for processing. The lawsuit was served to OpenAI on September 2, focusing on its internal initiative Project Lily. According to the complaint, "AI data reviewers" and "chatbot evaluators" recruited through a third-party staffing company read real ChatGPT prompts and complete conversations, summarize user intent, and score and comment on responses from four models on a scale of 1 to 7.This process is known in the industry as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which is a fundamental method for enhancing chatbot capabilities. The complaint states that users were never explicitly informed that a person, rather than a machine, might be reading their conversations. OpenAI filters conversations through an automated system before human review, but the complaint alleges that the filters cannot intercept all content, and personal details sometimes still reach contractors. 404 Media first reported on the project on September 14 and found that the reviewers' dashboard included "user memory summaries," which could expose users' approximate locations, occupations, or private life information, even though usernames had been removed.OpenAI stated that such reviews aim to reduce two behaviors: chatbots behaving too much like humans and overly catering to users, referred to by researchers as "flattery." The complaint raises eight legal claims, including violations of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumer Privacy Act, and common law claims for intrusion into private affairs, with the plaintiffs seeking damages, restitution of unjust enrichment, and punitive damages.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.