BTC $83,487.58 -0.86%
ETH $2,685.05 +0.41%
BNB $761.69 -1.65%
XRP $1.49 -1.04%
SOL $118.48 -2.42%
TRX $0.3357 +0.70%
DOGE $0.0934 -2.50%
ADA $0.2452 -2.90%
BCH $309.83 -6.23%
LINK $15.17 +8.75%
HYPE $87.18 -4.73%
AAVE $147.21 -4.58%
SUI $1.15 -7.24%
XLM $0.2242 +4.72%
ZEC $1,473.02 -7.25%
AAPL $338.88 -0.13%
AMZN $246.54 -0.96%
GOOGL $342.66 -0.26%
MSFT $510.09 -1.18%
META $718.28 -4.05%
NVDA $229.43 +2.28%
TSLA $358.58 -3.77%
SNDK $1,714.56 -3.41%
INTC $116.11 -6.13%
SPCX $146.27 -2.09%
MU $1,056.32 -3.01%
AMD $611.10 -3.23%
BTC $83,487.58 -0.86%
ETH $2,685.05 +0.41%
BNB $761.69 -1.65%
XRP $1.49 -1.04%
SOL $118.48 -2.42%
TRX $0.3357 +0.70%
DOGE $0.0934 -2.50%
ADA $0.2452 -2.90%
BCH $309.83 -6.23%
LINK $15.17 +8.75%
HYPE $87.18 -4.73%
AAVE $147.21 -4.58%
SUI $1.15 -7.24%
XLM $0.2242 +4.72%
ZEC $1,473.02 -7.25%
AAPL $338.88 -0.13%
AMZN $246.54 -0.96%
GOOGL $342.66 -0.26%
MSFT $510.09 -1.18%
META $718.28 -4.05%
NVDA $229.43 +2.28%
TSLA $358.58 -3.77%
SNDK $1,714.56 -3.41%
INTC $116.11 -6.13%
SPCX $146.27 -2.09%
MU $1,056.32 -3.01%
AMD $611.10 -3.23%

essential

All
Article
Flash

Arthur Hayes: AI "Safety First" is essentially a destruction of computing power demand; the U.S. government's ultimate choice in all scenarios is to print money, which ultimately benefits Bitcoin

Arthur Hayes published a new long article titled "Safety First," with the core argument that the claims of "safety first" by Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX, which lead to a slowdown in AGI development, are not out of concern for human welfare but rather due to economic realities. The market does not want AI; it wants AI at "Chinese prices," meaning it needs intelligence that is 100 times cheaper than what is currently available. Hayes points out that "safety first" essentially destroys the demand for computing power. If the spending on training new models decreases and laboratories shift towards efficiency optimization, customers will spend less on computing power. The three major AI laboratories do not generate any profits, and their demand for computing power supports over $10 trillion in investment-grade debt and hundreds of billions in low-quality debt, which rely on profitable tech companies like Nvidia, Broadcom, Google, and Microsoft for off-balance-sheet endorsements. The real backstop is the holders of insurance policies in the United States.Hayes cites an analysis by Nick Nameth that reveals a "self-insurance scam": private equity giants (such as Apollo, KKR, Brookfield, etc.) acquire insurance companies, stuffing AI data center debt and SaaS private credit impacted by AI into insurance assets, and then provide false endorsements with minimal capital through affiliated self-insurance reinsurance companies. Nameth estimates that the total amount of these false reinsurance assets reaches $1.54 trillion. Once the AI data center debt is downgraded by rating agencies due to insufficient demand for computing power, insurance companies will be forced to add capital, while the affiliated reinsurance companies will be unable to pay, leading to insolvency for the insurance companies. In most states in the U.S., the insurance protection limit is only $250,000 to $300,000, and existing insurance companies only pay into the protection fund afterward, which encourages all parties involved to maximize risk-taking. When AIG was bailed out in 2008, TARP funds ultimately flowed to Goldman Sachs and led to record bonuses, while the general public only received foreclosure notices; Hayes believes this scenario will repeat itself.For cryptocurrency investors, the conclusion is a win-win situation. If the U.S. government chooses to become the "last buyer of computing power," it will print money in the name of national security to fund unproductive economic goods, driving up financial speculation and Bitcoin prices; if the government chooses to bail out insolvent insurance companies, it will also need to print money to cover bad AI debts, increasing the money supply and pushing up Bitcoin. Hayes specifically points out that the Federal Reserve voted unanimously last week to raise interest rates by 25 basis points, and RMP bond purchases have stopped since August 14, but commercial banks have taken over to create over $100 billion in currency, and the interest rate hike allows banks to earn an additional $7.5 billion in excess reserve interest each year. This money will be used to expand loans and market speculation, and the net effect remains stimulative. The fluctuations in the cryptocurrency market, which saw a slight increase at the end of August, are about to end, the supply of dollars will continue to grow, and Bitcoin and some selected altcoins will rise. Hayes also described this situation as "incredibly wonderful," stating that the government will not allow the free market to stop building AI data centers, there will be an oversupply of spot computing power, the usage of AI agents will increase, and the surge in money printing will drive investors to chase cryptocurrency assets.

first_img ARK Invest researchers commented on OpenUSD: Essentially similar to early DAOs, competitor alliances face multiple obstacles

ARK Invest Research Director Lorenzo Valente commented on the OpenUSD stablecoin project launched by several institutions. He stated that, despite the strong capabilities of the participants (including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, Coinbase, etc.), OpenUSD faces multiple significant obstacles:First, there are liquidity and cold start issues; USDC and USDT have already formed strong network effects, dominating exchanges, payment processors, and brokers, making it difficult for the new stablecoin to gain trading pairs and large-scale holding willingness;Second, the decision-making speed of the alliance composed of 500 competitors will be extremely slow, lacking successful precedents, and conflicts of interest will be hard to coordinate;Third, the regulatory and antitrust risks are extremely high; the joint issuance of currency by large banks and card networks is likely to become a regulatory focus;Fourth, the revenue-sharing model results in issuers retaining too little capital, making it difficult to cover high operational and promotional expenses;Fifth, the actual commitments from partners are limited, mostly consisting of letters of intent (LOI), and parties are still supporting competitors, preferring multiple hedges rather than exclusive binding.Valente concluded that OpenUSD is essentially similar to "a DAO of multiple competitors," making it difficult to execute and make decisions quickly, and it may ultimately repeat the governance failures of early DAO projects, which could not be effectively implemented.Affected by the OpenUSD plan, Circle's stock fell over 17% in a single day, and ARK Invest took the opportunity to buy in.

WSJ: Stablecoins essentially belong to "private currency" and may pose risks to the financial system

The Wall Street Journal published an article pointing out that although the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act are promoting the compliance of stablecoins, the essence of stablecoins still belongs to "private currency," which may pose structural risks to the financial system.The article notes that stablecoins aim to combine the stability of the US dollar with the efficiency of blockchain payments, but because they operate on fragmented, privatized infrastructure, they do not possess the unity of the traditional US dollar system. Although USDT and USDC are pegged to the dollar, their prices may still deviate from 1 dollar.In addition, there is an incentive for stablecoin issuers to enhance returns by allocating high-risk, low-liquidity assets. If the value of these related assets declines, it could trigger de-pegging and concentrated redemption risks. The article cites Chainalysis data stating that stablecoins account for 84% of illegal activities in cryptocurrency, mainly involving sanctions evasion and money laundering, while real economic payment scenarios account for less than 1%.The Wall Street Journal believes that stablecoins are replaying the path of private currency experiments from the "Free Banking Era" in 19th century America, and in the future, they may need to accept stricter regulation like banks and integrate more deeply into the central bank system.

Raoul Pal: The current bull market cycle is expected to peak in 2026, and cryptocurrencies are essentially a macro asset

Former Goldman Sachs executive, author of "Global Macro Investor," and co-founder and CEO of Real Vision, Raoul Pal, stated at the Solana Breakpoint conference:"The decline in labor force participation means a decrease in the working population. And demographic structure is key to driving debt. Population growth will continue to decline, which means the debt-to-GDP ratio will continue to rise, and that is the problem.We have to face the global debt issue, and currency devaluation has always been a way to address (or rather postpone) this problem. We are starting to see signs that the Federal Reserve will have to reconsider its balance sheet and begin to think about how to 'monetize' all this debt. It is expected that over the next 12 months, we will need to print about $8 trillion in cash through liquidity injections.I know many people may think the crypto cycle is over and feel that 'the good times are gone.' But in fact, what drives all of this is cyclical, not from the Bitcoin halving cycle, but driven by the debt maturity cycle.So, I believe this is not a 4-year cycle, but a 5.4-year cycle. In a 5.4-year cycle, we have now passed the trough of the cycle, and the next step is the rising phase, with the cycle expected to peak at the end of 2026, not 2025. This is a breakthrough understanding for us as global macro investors: understanding that cryptocurrency is actually a macro asset.Additionally, the altcoin/Bitcoin cross rate is driven by the business cycle, and the business cycle seems to be bottoming out, not peaking."
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.