BTC $83,555.31 -0.99%
ETH $2,690.91 +0.22%
BNB $763.01 -1.87%
XRP $1.49 -1.12%
SOL $118.77 -2.52%
TRX $0.3353 +0.63%
DOGE $0.0937 -2.65%
ADA $0.2466 -2.82%
BCH $310.07 -6.58%
LINK $15.43 +10.39%
HYPE $87.41 -4.59%
AAVE $148.86 -3.66%
SUI $1.15 -7.54%
XLM $0.2285 +6.23%
ZEC $1,481.39 -6.90%
AAPL $338.72 -0.30%
AMZN $246.58 -1.05%
GOOGL $342.66 -0.17%
MSFT $509.74 -1.31%
META $718.66 -4.11%
NVDA $229.64 +2.35%
TSLA $358.42 -3.83%
SNDK $1,717.13 -3.19%
INTC $116.32 -5.62%
SPCX $146.29 -2.14%
MU $1,057.66 -3.00%
AMD $611.83 -2.93%
BTC $83,555.31 -0.99%
ETH $2,690.91 +0.22%
BNB $763.01 -1.87%
XRP $1.49 -1.12%
SOL $118.77 -2.52%
TRX $0.3353 +0.63%
DOGE $0.0937 -2.65%
ADA $0.2466 -2.82%
BCH $310.07 -6.58%
LINK $15.43 +10.39%
HYPE $87.41 -4.59%
AAVE $148.86 -3.66%
SUI $1.15 -7.54%
XLM $0.2285 +6.23%
ZEC $1,481.39 -6.90%
AAPL $338.72 -0.30%
AMZN $246.58 -1.05%
GOOGL $342.66 -0.17%
MSFT $509.74 -1.31%
META $718.66 -4.11%
NVDA $229.64 +2.35%
TSLA $358.42 -3.83%
SNDK $1,717.13 -3.19%
INTC $116.32 -5.62%
SPCX $146.29 -2.14%
MU $1,057.66 -3.00%
AMD $611.83 -2.93%

losses

All
Article
Flash

Bitget CEO live-streamed a response to the platform's first security incident in eight years: the attack originated from a vulnerability in a third-party security product, and the losses will be covered by the user protection fund

In today's community live broadcast, Bitget CEO Gracy responded to recent security incidents and the platform's financial status. She candidly stated that this is the first security incident encountered since Bitget was established 8 years ago. After a complete trace, it was found that hackers exploited vulnerabilities in third-party security products to steal internal network access credentials, forged withdrawal commands to the wallet system, and deceived the wallet into executing abnormal transfers that bypassed risk checks. Gracy emphasized that no private keys were leaked, and cold wallets were unaffected; specific technical details will be disclosed in the formally released security report.Gracy pointed out that the verified losses from this incident are within the coverage of the protection fund, and user funds are not affected. The platform's own funds exceed $1.4 billion, which includes approximately $464 million in the user protection fund. The platform will continue to uphold the security commitments made when the protection fund was established in 2022, planning to replenish the fund to the baseline of $300 million within a week."The protection fund is not just a slogan, but an important mechanism that provides tangible security for users in the event of extreme security incidents," Gracy stated. In the face of sudden security challenges, the platform's comprehensive strength and its ability to take responsibility are important criteria for measuring its risk response capability and long-term credibility. Bitget will continue to uphold its long-term commitment to prioritize user interests.

Caixin: Poker expert Hu Zheweng has suffered three consecutive losses in the cryptocurrency market and has filed a lawsuit against Jump Trading and Chinese professor Zhang Yongfeng

According to Caixin, poker master and seasoned cryptocurrency investor Hu Zheweng made significant bets during the three waves of cryptocurrency frenzy involving ICOs, algorithmic stablecoins, and AI tokens, but faced consecutive failures. Hu Zheweng claimed to have invested in the blockchain project Stratis, achieving a return of "over 1000 times."According to disclosed information, Hu Zheweng invested approximately 80 million USD in algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (UST) and its sister token LUNA from May 2021 to May 2022, with the peak market value of his holdings exceeding 800 million USD, but the price of LUNA subsequently nearly dropped to zero.In addition, Hu Zheweng has filed a lawsuit in Chicago, USA against the globally renowned quantitative trading firm Jump Trading and its related companies and executives in the cryptocurrency business, seeking at least 500 million USD in damages. After experiencing Stox and Terra, Hu Zheweng has not left the cryptocurrency market; last January, he bet on a new project by a Chinese computer professor Zhang Yongfeng. Zhang Yongfeng entered the Computer Science Department of Tsinghua University in 2007 and is currently a tenured associate professor in the Computer Science Department at Rutgers University in the USA. He has been sued by Hu Zheweng on multiple charges including "securities fraud." It is reported that the tokens issued by the organization founded by Zhang Yongfeng, in which Hu Zheweng invested millions of dollars, have fallen over 99.6% from their peak in 2025.

first_img Bitget: A small amount of hot wallets were unauthorizedly transferred, involving 351.6 million USD; the vast majority of the platform's assets are safe, and the protection fund can cover the losses

The cryptocurrency trading platform Bitget announced on its official X account that on September 24, 2026, at 18:31 (UTC), its security system detected unauthorized transfers from a small number of hot wallets. The security team has immediately initiated an emergency response procedure and started a comprehensive investigation.Bitget stated that, based on current assessments, approximately $351.6 million in assets are affected. Cold wallets and the vast majority of assets on the platform remain secure and unaffected, and user funds are still protected. The incident falls within the coverage of the user protection fund, which currently holds over $464 million.Bitget mentioned that customer account balances remain accurate, and deposits and transactions continue to operate normally. As a precautionary measure, withdrawals have been temporarily suspended to allow the team to complete a thorough security review. The company has identified and flagged the relevant transfer addresses, formally contacted law enforcement agencies and on-chain security partners, and will restore withdrawals as soon as safety is confirmed, providing subsequent updates through official channels while refraining from speculating on the attack path during the investigation.

Data: Garrett Jin, representing the whale entity, once held 10 billion USD in BTC and has incurred significant losses multiple times over the past year

According to EmberCN monitoring, the whale entity represented by Garrett Jin accumulated approximately 100,800 BTC at an average price of about $7,242 from May to June 2018. The value of the holdings at the same time last year once exceeded $10 billion, and subsequent investment funds mainly came from selling BTC.Starting in August 2025, the entity gradually sold about 89,000 BTC and bought approximately 900,000 ETH, with an average cost of over $3,500 for ETH. The related ETH was subsequently transferred to Binance in the first half of 2026. In December 2025, the entity went long on ETH on Hyperliquid; in early February 2026, the price of ETH dropped from $3,000 to $1,800, resulting in a liquidation of 213,000 ETH long positions worth about $670 million, with a margin loss of approximately $230 million.During the same period, the entity was believed to have provided some funds to Trend Research. A leveraged long position of 651,500 ETH by Trend Research had a stop loss, resulting in a loss of about $734 million. The entity also extracted and purchased on-chain through Binance from February to June this year, accumulating approximately 289.6 million "Binance Life" tokens, valued at about $150 million, accounting for 28.9% of the total supply of the token. In March, when the entity exchanged 50.43 million aEthUSDT for aEthAAVE, it encountered extreme slippage, only exchanging for 327.2 AAVE, resulting in a loss of about $50.39 million. Since July, the entity has been shorting ZEC on Hyperliquid, currently facing an unrealized loss of about $34 million.

Phishing websites use meme coin display pages to attract traffic, resulting in significant losses for multiple traders

Recently, the meme coin market has been booming, and on-chain trading has become increasingly active. However, with the warming market, meme coin display pages have frequently shown highly disguised phishing links, and the "novel" attack methods have caused several seasoned traders to fall victim. Crypto KOLs @insidecalls and @cladzsol recently revealed that while scanning chains, they clicked on the meme coin homepage, which resulted in a "cloudfare verification" prompt. After completing the verification as instructed, the victim's on-chain funds were stolen. Among them, @cladzsol lost approximately $600,000 in assets.According to market news, on several recently popular meme coin display pages, the homepage redirects to a "cloudfare verification" page, which is actually a phishing link. If users follow the prompts, their computer systems will download and execute malicious scripts, leading to asset loss. This phenomenon is so rampant that it may be related to the delayed review processes of mainstream trading aggregation platforms like DexScreener. Currently, the display logic of relevant platforms is to directly reference the "official website" or social media links filled in the token metadata. These fields can be updated by token creators or those who later claim "community takeover." Hackers are exploiting this review loophole to transform meme coin display pages into new "fishing grounds" for phishing attacks. Users may inevitably click on unfamiliar links during the chain scanning process; if a "cloudfare verification" or other highly suspicious page appears, they should close it immediately to avoid interaction and protect their asset security.

first_img The Cronos network has suspended operations due to an attack on Tectonic, with estimated losses of around 75 million dollars

The Cronos network associated with Crypto.com has paused operations after detecting an attack on the lending protocol Tectonic. The Cronos Network stated on the X platform that it has identified vulnerabilities on Tectonic and has paused the network. Tectonic also confirmed that it is investigating the related incident and advised users not to interact with the protocol until safety is confirmed. According to DefiLlama data, Tectonic had a total locked value of approximately $121.7 million before the incident, with active loans of about $82.7 million.On-chain researcher Weilin Li attributed the attack to price manipulation of the TONIC token. The attacker bought enough TONIC within 20 minutes to inflate its price by about 100 times, and then used the inflated tokens as collateral to borrow other assets from Tectonic, a method similar to the 2022 Mango Markets oracle manipulation attack. Li initially estimated that the attacker profited about $66 million, and later discovered another address controlled by a different attacker containing about $8 million, bringing the total estimate to around $75 million. Li also stated that the attacker only successfully bridged about $6 million to Ethereum, as the pause on the Cronos network prevented most affected assets from flowing out.Crypto.com CEO Kris Marsalek stated that the company's app and exchange were not attacked, and its security team is assisting Tectonic with the investigation.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.