Scan to download
BTC $79,080.98 -2.71%
ETH $2,220.56 -3.14%
BNB $673.13 -0.86%
XRP $1.43 -4.67%
SOL $89.21 -3.66%
TRX $0.3515 -0.94%
DOGE $0.1129 -2.24%
ADA $0.2606 -4.24%
BCH $424.51 -2.96%
LINK $10.02 -5.27%
HYPE $44.52 +1.60%
AAVE $92.66 -6.79%
SUI $1.09 -8.39%
XLM $0.1543 -6.17%
ZEC $515.95 -3.88%
BTC $79,080.98 -2.71%
ETH $2,220.56 -3.14%
BNB $673.13 -0.86%
XRP $1.43 -4.67%
SOL $89.21 -3.66%
TRX $0.3515 -0.94%
DOGE $0.1129 -2.24%
ADA $0.2606 -4.24%
BCH $424.51 -2.96%
LINK $10.02 -5.27%
HYPE $44.52 +1.60%
AAVE $92.66 -6.79%
SUI $1.09 -8.39%
XLM $0.1543 -6.17%
ZEC $515.95 -3.88%

free

U.S. judge postpones hearing on Aave's application to unfreeze $71 million in stolen ETH

U.S. Judge Margaret M. Garnett in New York postponed the ruling on Aave's emergency application on Wednesday, which aims to unfreeze $71 million in ETH related to the Kelp DAO hacking incident, and requested both parties to submit supplemental briefs before the hearing on June 5. Aave is attempting to reclaim the $71 million in ETH frozen on Arbitrum to assist in the asset recovery efforts from this hacking incident—Kelp DAO suffered losses of up to $293 million from the hack, making it one of the most severe security incidents in the DeFi space this year.However, the U.S. law firm Gerstein Harrow LLP submitted a restraining order to the court in early May, claiming that its client has rights to the aforementioned funds. Aave then filed an emergency motion to lift the freeze, warning that if the funds are not released in a timely manner, it could lead to user liquidations and potentially impact the entire DeFi market. Judge Garnett noted in her ruling that Aave failed to adequately explain how user funds would incur "compound losses" if the restraining order remained in place. She also acknowledged the complexity of the case, the risks faced by the victims, and requested both parties to provide supplemental statements on six key issues, including: whether the hacking transaction is subject to New York state sanctuary principles, the legal distinctions between fraud and theft and what rights the hacker has over the stolen assets, which laws apply to determine the priority of claims for frozen assets, whether constructive trusts are an appropriate remedy, and whether Aave or Arbitrum can identify individual victims and proportionally return assets. Both parties must submit supplemental briefs by May 22.Meanwhile, the overall compensation work for Kelp DAO is progressing. Kelp and Aave announced on Tuesday that the rsETH held by the hacker has been destroyed on Arbitrum, and approximately $278 million in loss tokens will be restored within the next two weeks through the funds of the Aave Recovery Guardian multi-signature wallet. Once the relevant smart contracts are reactivated, all functions of rsETH will return to normal.

US law firm applies to block the transfer of Kelp attack, freezing ETH, involving compensation amounting to over 870 million dollars

According to Cointelegraph, the U.S. law firm Gerstein Harrow LLP has applied to the court for an injunction to prevent Arbitrum DAO from transferring frozen Ethereum assets related to the Kelp attack.The law firm claims that its clients have obtained default judgments in three cases against North Korea, totaling approximately $877 million (including punitive damages and interest), and assert a right to claim the related assets.Previously, Kelp DAO was attacked on April 18, resulting in losses of about $292 million, which is believed to be related to the North Korean hacker group Lazarus Group. Subsequently, the Arbitrum security committee urgently froze approximately 30,766 Ether (about $73 million).The incident has sparked controversy. Some community members believe that if the injunction takes effect, it will delay the return of funds to the victimized users and shift the North Korean-related debts onto secondary victims. Previously, Aave Labs had proposed to unfreeze the funds and inject them into a compensation fund to restore the damaged assets.It is worth noting that Gerstein Harrow has previously filed claims regarding assets stolen by North Korean-related hackers and frozen by cryptocurrency platforms, including the 2023 Heco Bridge incident. Industry analysts believe that this case may have a demonstrative impact on the disposal of DAO assets and the definition of cross-jurisdictional claims.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.