arbitrum

According to reports, LG Electronics has chosen the Ethereum Layer 2 network Arbitrum to develop a new blockchain to support advertising and media-related scenarios. Following the announcement, Arbitrum's native token ARB rose more than 5% in a single day. The network will be used for the delivery, purchase, sale, and management of digital advertising, and will record user interactions with advertising content.Arbitrum is developed by Offchain Labs and uses Optimistic Rollup technology, aiming to provide a faster and lower-cost transaction experience for Ethereum. This is not LG's first foray into blockchain. Previously, LG launched the enterprise-level blockchain Monachain through its IT services division LG CNS and developed the crypto wallet Wallypto; it also launched the Art Lab NFT marketplace, but that platform was shut down last year.

According to official news, the Arbitrum Foundation has initiated a new round of funding requests to the Arbitrum DAO, planning to obtain 16 million US dollars in stablecoins, 1,740 ETH, and 230 million ARB, with a total value of approximately 43.5 million US dollars.The funds raised this time will be specifically used for the foundation's operational work in 2027, covering areas such as technical infrastructure, ecosystem development, marketing promotion, and governance services. The ARB tokens requested in this application account for 3.7% of the total supply. In comparison, the Arbitrum DAO's total revenue for the year 2025 is approximately 23.49 million US dollars. Currently, this funding proposal is still in the community governance discussion stage.

According to on-chain data, the private key of the StakeDAO deployer was leaked on Arbitrum, and the attacker minted approximately 54.5 trillion vsdCRV, partially exchanging it for 43.7 ETH.

WasabiCard announced the official support for the Arbitrum network, further expanding its multi-chain payment infrastructure capabilities. Through this integration, users can directly recharge their WasabiCard accounts on-chain via Arbitrum, achieving more efficient and low-cost capital flow, and further enhancing the global payment experience.As a leading Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, Arbitrum features lower gas fees and higher transaction efficiency. This integration will help users more conveniently convert on-chain assets into funds available for global payments, subscriptions, and cross-border transactions, further connecting Web3 assets with real commercial payment scenarios.WasabiCard stated that it will continue to expand its multi-chain payment capabilities in the future, promoting the practical application of stablecoins and on-chain assets in global payment scenarios.

The DeFi lending protocol Alchemix announced the completion of its cross-chain infrastructure update. The old alUSD / alETH cross-chain bridge on Optimism and Arbitrum has officially been taken offline and replaced with a new cross-chain bridge compatible with v3 alchemist.Alchemix disclosed that it has synchronized the DVN (cross-chain transaction validation) configuration, maintaining a 2/3 multi-signature confirmation mechanism for cross-chain transactions, while introducing Deutsche Telekom as a validation service provider to enhance the reliability of the cross-chain validation infrastructure.

According to CoinDesk, the U.S. law firm Charles Gerstein has filed a petition in the Manhattan federal court, requesting an order for Tether to transfer over $344 million of frozen USDT to victims holding judgments against Iran for unpaid terrorism claims. These USDT were previously frozen by Tether after the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control identified the related Tron wallets as belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps of Iran.The plaintiffs argue that since OFAC has designated the relevant wallets as owned by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, and Tether has frozen the related tokens, Tether can fully reissue an equivalent amount of USDT to a wallet controlled by the victims' attorney. This case is part of a broader legal strategy by Charles Gerstein aimed at leveraging the ability of crypto platforms to freeze and transfer digital assets to enforce terrorism-related judgments. Unlike the Arbitrum case involving North Korean-linked hacker funds, in this case, OFAC has clearly designated the relevant wallets as owned

Arbitrum official announcement, the x402 protocol under Coinbase is now live on the Arbitrum network, allowing developers to enable AI agents to directly use stablecoins to pay for APIs, services, and software fees. The x402 protocol is named after the unused HTTP 402 "Payment Required" status code, which allows websites, APIs, and AI bots to request and receive instant micropayments through blockchain and traditional payment channels.The protocol is managed as an open standard by the x402 Foundation under the Linux Foundation and has the support of over 20 institutions and crypto companies, including Cloudflare, Stripe, AWS, Google, Visa, Base, Circle, and the Solana Foundation.

Aave stated that the first steps of the rsETH technical recovery plan have been completed, which includes the destruction of the rsETH held by the attacker on Arbitrum. In the coming days, stakeholders will gradually replenish funds to the LayerZero OFT adapter and restart rsETH-related operations in phases.Kelp previously stated that it has completed a series of rsETH endorsement recovery steps with Aave, planning to gradually inject 117,132 rsETH from the Aave Recovery Guardian and Kelp Recovery Safe into the LayerZero OFT adapter on the Ethereum mainnet.

According to official news, based on the update from the Arbitrum DAO proposal, a judgment creditor in an unrelated case served a restraining order to Arbitrum DAO regarding the ETH frozen after the rsETH incident. A few days later, Aave LLC filed an emergency motion to vacate. The court modified the restraining order, allowing for on-chain Arbitrum voting and transferring the frozen ETH to Aave LLC.After the transfer, the restraining order will attach to Aave LLC. The revised constitutional AIP retains the asset recovery intent approved by Arbitrum DAO, and ETH will still be used for the recovery of the rsETH incident. Aave LLC will comply with all court obligations during the litigation process.

Renegade posted on platform X that a legacy V1 version of the protocol was attacked earlier this morning, resulting in a loss of approximately $209,000. White hat hackers have returned about $190,000, and all affected users will receive full compensation.The team confirmed that the issue only exists in the V1 Arbitrum deployment, and other deployments (V1 Base, V2 Arbitrum, V2 Base) are safe. All infrastructure supporting V1 Arbitrum transactions has been suspended, with no further risk to funds, and integrators do not need to take any action.

U.S. Manhattan Federal Court Judge Margaret Garnett approved Aave's asset recovery plan following the rsETH attack incident, allowing approximately $71 million in ETH that had previously been frozen on Arbitrum to be transferred to a wallet controlled by Aave.Court documents show that this decision modifies a prior injunction against the Arbitrum DAO, allowing the community to complete the ETH transfer through on-chain governance voting, while exempting participants in the voting and execution of the transfer from related legal liabilities. This incident stems from the rsETH attack that occurred in April, which has been widely attributed to the Lazarus Group, linked to North Korea. Previously, lawyers representing the families of North Korean terrorism victims had sought to freeze the related assets and attempted to include them in the compensation for an outstanding judgment of approximately $877 million.The Arbitrum community has shown strong support in a Snapshot temperature check vote for returning the frozen ETH to Aave's recovery plan, but the actual transfer still requires formal approval through on-chain governance. Reports indicate that this case is also part of the U.S. plaintiffs' efforts to recover crypto assets associated with North Korea. In addition to Arbitrum, the plaintiffs had previously sued the privacy protocol Railgun DAO and listed Digital Currency Group (DCG) as one of the defendants, accusing it of participating in related governance and economic activities.

The Arbitrum DAO vote approved the proposal to release the frozen ETH, with a support rate of 90.96%. The proposal includes a request for Arbitrum governance to approve the release of 30,765.67 ETH frozen by the Arbitrum Security Committee on April 21, and to transfer the funds into a 3/4 multi-signature wallet jointly controlled by Aave Labs, KelpDAO, EtherFi, and Certora. This address will be specifically used for recovery work after receiving the ETH frozen by Arbitrum.

According to official news, Aave LLC has submitted an emergency motion requesting the withdrawal of the asset freeze notice issued to Arbitrum DAO on May 1, 2026. This notice attempts to seize approximately $71 million worth of ETH, which belongs to the victims of the attack on April 18.Aave stated that attackers do not gain legal ownership of stolen property merely by stealing it, as the law clearly stipulates. The assets being recovered are intended to be returned to users affected by the attack on April 18, 2026. Freezing these assets harms the users that the recovery efforts are supposed to protect.Aave has requested the court to hold an emergency hearing and temporarily lift the freeze order, while continuing to work with the Arbitrum community and DeFi United to compensate the affected users.

According to Cointelegraph, the U.S. law firm Gerstein Harrow LLP has applied to the court for an injunction to prevent Arbitrum DAO from transferring frozen Ethereum assets related to the Kelp attack.The law firm claims that its clients have obtained default judgments in three cases against North Korea, totaling approximately $877 million (including punitive damages and interest), and assert a right to claim the related assets.Previously, Kelp DAO was attacked on April 18, resulting in losses of about $292 million, which is believed to be related to the North Korean hacker group Lazarus Group. Subsequently, the Arbitrum security committee urgently froze approximately 30,766 Ether (about $73 million).The incident has sparked controversy. Some community members believe that if the injunction takes effect, it will delay the return of funds to the victimized users and shift the North Korean-related debts onto secondary victims. Previously, Aave Labs had proposed to unfreeze the funds and inject them into a compensation fund to restore the damaged assets.It is worth noting that Gerstein Harrow has previously filed claims regarding assets stolen by North Korean-related hackers and frozen by cryptocurrency platforms, including the 2023 Heco Bridge incident. Industry analysts believe that this case may have a demonstrative impact on the disposal of DAO assets and the definition of cross-jurisdictional claims.

MegaETH supervisor PaperImperium disclosed on platform X that documents from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York show that the U.S. court has issued a restraining order to Arbitrum DAO, prohibiting it from transferring approximately $71 million in ETH assets that were frozen during the KelpDAO hacking incident.The plaintiffs are attempting to use these funds to enforce unpaid judgment compensations related to North Korea's involvement in terrorism, kidnapping, and other cases over the years, and have applied to serve legal notice to Arbitrum DAO by alternative means, treating it as a "partnership organization" that can be held accountable. The court documents also indicate that Arbitrum DAO has a Security Council governed by ARB holders, which has the ability to take action in emergencies; therefore, if relevant members refuse to cooperate, they may face legal liabilities such as contempt of court. The market believes that this case may become an important precedent for the U.S. judicial system directly constraining DAO governance structures and further highlight the compliance pressures DeFi protocols face within real legal frameworks.

According to market news, the Arbitrum committee voted to unfreeze $71 million worth of Ethereum to mitigate the $290 million loss caused by the Kelp DAO vulnerability.

Arbitrum DAO has begun voting on the release of the stolen Ethereum that was frozen by Arbitrum in the Kelp DAO theft incident.The proposal suggests setting up a multi-signature address, with signers including Aave Labs, Kelp DAO, Certora, and EtherFi. This address will be specifically used for recovery work after receiving the Ethereum frozen by Arbitrum. Currently, the voting approval rate for this proposal is 100%, and the voting will end on May 8 at 2:54 Beijing time.

Arbitrum DAO has initiated a governance vote to release 30,766 ETH that was previously frozen, to support the aftermath plan of Kelp DAO following the attack, DeFi United.This portion of assets was frozen by the Arbitrum Security Council on April 20, valued at approximately $71.1 million, originally funds transferred by the attacker to the Arbitrum network. If the proposal passes, this will become the largest financial support in the DeFi United plan. At the beginning of the vote, 16.9 million ARB have supported the proposal, and there are currently no opposing votes. The voting will continue until May 7.

According to official news, after discussions with multiple stakeholders, Aave service providers, ether.fi, KelpDAO, and other projects have submitted a governance proposal to the Arbitrum DAO, requesting the release of ETH that was frozen by the Arbitrum security committee after the rsETH incident on April 18.The announcement stated that if these ETH are released, the funds will be directed to DeFi United. Aave firmly believes that this contribution will significantly advance the path to a solution.