Scan to download
BTC $59,437.69 -0.89%
ETH $1,589.94 +0.73%
BNB $551.54 -0.29%
XRP $1.04 -0.21%
SOL $74.02 +1.91%
TRX $0.3189 -1.46%
DOGE $0.0722 -0.63%
ADA $0.1448 -0.07%
BCH $200.20 +1.74%
LINK $7.29 -0.37%
HYPE $65.59 +4.88%
AAVE $90.13 -1.48%
SUI $0.6959 +0.08%
XLM $0.1818 +4.94%
ZEC $399.16 +4.52%
BTC $59,437.69 -0.89%
ETH $1,589.94 +0.73%
BNB $551.54 -0.29%
XRP $1.04 -0.21%
SOL $74.02 +1.91%
TRX $0.3189 -1.46%
DOGE $0.0722 -0.63%
ADA $0.1448 -0.07%
BCH $200.20 +1.74%
LINK $7.29 -0.37%
HYPE $65.59 +4.88%
AAVE $90.13 -1.48%
SUI $0.6959 +0.08%
XLM $0.1818 +4.94%
ZEC $399.16 +4.52%

sat

All
Article
Flash

Strive CEO: The significant fluctuations of STRC and SATA today are due to leveraged liquidations, not a deterioration in underlying credit

Strive CEO Matt Cole stated that today is the most difficult day in the history of digital credit. STRC rebounded significantly after hitting a low of $82.5 during the trading session, while SATA recovered after dropping to just over $90 near its par value, with many investors experiencing a tough trading day. Matt Cole indicated that what occurred today was a leveraged liquidation event, not a deterioration in underlying credit quality.He pointed out that when investors find a certain type of asset with a high yield, relatively low volatility, and strong underlying credit characteristics, they often increase returns through borrowing and leveraging. However, once the market moves in the opposite direction, forced selling can trigger a cycle of price declines, margin calls, and further selling, causing the sell-off to detach from fundamentals and driven by balance sheet constraints. He emphasized that the issuer's credit quality remains robust. Strive's dividend reserves are intact, the company is not under pressure, and it still has the ability to meet obligations and continue executing its strategy.He also mentioned that both STRC and SATA saw significant buying near their intraday lows and quickly recovered, indicating that there is actual demand in the lower price range. Matt Cole stated that liquidation events are not the same as credit events. Today's price fluctuations did not change his confidence in the long-term opportunities in digital credit; instead, it reinforced his view that the sector is building a new category of financial instruments and will experience similar growing pains before maturing into a large fixed income market.

Raydium core contributors: will fully compensate for stolen assets, the current mainnet program has not been affected

Raydium core contributor InfraRAY posted on platform X, stating that the team has confirmed that the old version of the AMM V3 program, which was previously discontinued in 2021, has been attacked. The attacker unauthorizedly removed part of the liquidity, but this incident does not affect current Raydium users, and the related liquidity pools have been unable to interact through the official Raydium UI since being disabled. The Raydium SDK and DApp also do not support operations on the mainnet old version AMM V3 liquidity pools.The five affected liquidity pools include: Sollet USDT-RAY, Sollet ETH-RAY, SRM-RAY, USDC-RAY, and RAY-SOL. Preliminary statistics show that the stolen assets include approximately 150,177 RAY, 5,603 SOL, and 893,700 USDC, with a total value of about $1.34 million. The related losses will be fully compensated by the treasury.Investigations reveal that the vulnerability originated from insufficient verification of the LP token minting address. The attacker created new LP tokens and impersonated legitimate LP tokens, bypassing the protocol's ratio verification mechanism to extract funds. However, this incident is classified as an independent logical vulnerability and is not due to private key leakage or permission intrusion, and there is no risk of spread. Currently, all existing Raydium mainnet programs have not been affected.

PiggyBank discloses details of the LAB basis trading manipulation incident and will compensate affected users

PiggyBank released a detailed report on the LAB incident on June 6, stating that the protocol experienced a net withdrawal of approximately $579,000 on June 6, primarily due to a LAB token basis trade being manipulated by the market.In early May, PiggyBank purchased 142,800 locked LAB tokens (approximately $102,500) through an OTC intermediary while simultaneously opening a perpetual contract short hedge. However, market participants continuously maintained the spot price above the perpetual contract price, resulting in a deeply negative funding rate (annualized -17,000%), and the high hedging costs forced the shorts to close, resulting in a loss of approximately $476,000. The currently locked LAB tokens have a spot value of about $1 million, but due to poor liquidity and lack of hedging, they have been excluded from the NAV calculation.PiggyBank will undergo structural reforms: increasing transparency of on-chain mechanisms, strategy logic, and fund allocation will be publicly verifiable, while basis trading and funding rate arbitrage will be gradually phased out. In terms of compensation, affected users will receive USDC compensation based on actual losses, with funding sources including NAV discrepancies, future LAB sales (expected to unlock from August 14 to October 14, currently valued at approximately $1 million), and 50% of future platform revenue. All users recorded in the snapshot on June 6 are eligible for compensation.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.