BTC $83,491.62 -0.81%
ETH $2,689.28 +0.51%
BNB $761.96 -1.75%
XRP $1.49 -0.91%
SOL $118.68 -2.28%
TRX $0.3358 +0.77%
DOGE $0.0935 -2.36%
ADA $0.2457 -2.77%
BCH $310.60 -6.40%
LINK $15.32 +9.94%
HYPE $87.30 -4.48%
AAVE $147.83 -4.00%
SUI $1.15 -7.61%
XLM $0.2256 +5.41%
ZEC $1,479.26 -6.69%
AAPL $338.80 -0.16%
AMZN $246.53 -1.04%
GOOGL $342.67 -0.24%
MSFT $510.02 -1.30%
META $718.72 -4.07%
NVDA $229.41 +2.20%
TSLA $358.55 -3.81%
SNDK $1,715.76 -3.25%
INTC $116.22 -5.72%
SPCX $146.16 -2.17%
MU $1,056.40 -3.14%
AMD $611.66 -3.01%
BTC $83,491.62 -0.81%
ETH $2,689.28 +0.51%
BNB $761.96 -1.75%
XRP $1.49 -0.91%
SOL $118.68 -2.28%
TRX $0.3358 +0.77%
DOGE $0.0935 -2.36%
ADA $0.2457 -2.77%
BCH $310.60 -6.40%
LINK $15.32 +9.94%
HYPE $87.30 -4.48%
AAVE $147.83 -4.00%
SUI $1.15 -7.61%
XLM $0.2256 +5.41%
ZEC $1,479.26 -6.69%
AAPL $338.80 -0.16%
AMZN $246.53 -1.04%
GOOGL $342.67 -0.24%
MSFT $510.02 -1.30%
META $718.72 -4.07%
NVDA $229.41 +2.20%
TSLA $358.55 -3.81%
SNDK $1,715.76 -3.25%
INTC $116.22 -5.72%
SPCX $146.16 -2.17%
MU $1,056.40 -3.14%
AMD $611.66 -3.01%

party

All
Article
Flash

Bitget CEO live-streamed a response to the platform's first security incident in eight years: the attack originated from a vulnerability in a third-party security product, and the losses will be covered by the user protection fund

In today's community live broadcast, Bitget CEO Gracy responded to recent security incidents and the platform's financial status. She candidly stated that this is the first security incident encountered since Bitget was established 8 years ago. After a complete trace, it was found that hackers exploited vulnerabilities in third-party security products to steal internal network access credentials, forged withdrawal commands to the wallet system, and deceived the wallet into executing abnormal transfers that bypassed risk checks. Gracy emphasized that no private keys were leaked, and cold wallets were unaffected; specific technical details will be disclosed in the formally released security report.Gracy pointed out that the verified losses from this incident are within the coverage of the protection fund, and user funds are not affected. The platform's own funds exceed $1.4 billion, which includes approximately $464 million in the user protection fund. The platform will continue to uphold the security commitments made when the protection fund was established in 2022, planning to replenish the fund to the baseline of $300 million within a week."The protection fund is not just a slogan, but an important mechanism that provides tangible security for users in the event of extreme security incidents," Gracy stated. In the face of sudden security challenges, the platform's comprehensive strength and its ability to take responsibility are important criteria for measuring its risk response capability and long-term credibility. Bitget will continue to uphold its long-term commitment to prioritize user interests.

first_img Celsius bankruptcy liquidation party sues BitMEX, claiming 495 million USD

The liquidator of the bankrupt cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius Network has sued BitMEX, accusing it of fraud and market manipulation during forced liquidations in March 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic, seeking the return of 6,360 BTC, equivalent to approximately $495 million at current prices. The lawsuit was filed on September 12 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York by the litigation manager appointed in the Celsius bankruptcy case, Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium.The defendants include five entities: HDR Global Trading, ABS Global Trading, Shine Effort, 100x Holdings, and HDR Global Services, registered across Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Seychelles, and the United States. Celsius claims it lost 1,325.84 BTC during a liquidation on March 12, 2020, and is seeking to recover debts transferred by the investment fund JST, which lost 5,034.33 BTC the following day. The positions held by both could only be profitable when Bitcoin was rising or stable, and the lawsuit alleges that BitMEX simultaneously controlled the system that decided when customers were liquidated and the insurance fund that profited from the liquidations.The allegations have not yet been verified, and this is the second lawsuit BitMEX has faced since announcing its liquidation in July; the exchange will cease trading on September 23.

first_img Former Sonic CEO Michael Kong: Departure was not voluntary, the other party refused to fulfill the agreement

Former Sonic CEO Michael Kong posted a response to Sonic Labs' recent statement of "immediate termination of cooperation." He stated that the company still sought his assistance on the same day and expressed hope for his well-being, but the announcement did not specify the reason, leading to the misleading impression that "he may have been dismissed due to misconduct." Kong indicated that this departure was not voluntary; after working at Fantom/Sonic for over eight years, he negotiated and signed a severance and release agreement with Sonic Labs and its affiliates.Kong mentioned that for the past two and a half months, Sonic Labs repeatedly promised to fulfill the agreement but is currently refusing to do so, and the existing contractual agreements have also not been honored. The release agreement stipulates that both parties shall not publicly disparage each other, yet matters that should have been handled internally were made public by Sonic Labs, causing damage, which is why he chose to respond publicly. He noted that he had almost single-handedly won the company a lawsuit in South Korea worth approximately $150 million, which was described as one of the largest cryptocurrency disputes in South Korea, and cited a written evaluation from David Richardson, the owner of Fantom and Sonic, stating that his work should be appreciated by the foundation.Kong stated that he reserves all rights to make any claims against Sonic Labs and its affiliates.

first_img Loomis criticizes the Democratic Party for delaying the Clarity Act, stating that further compromise is still needed

U.S. Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis has once again criticized the Democrats for delaying the much-anticipated Clarity Act. Lummis stated in response to a Semafor report on the X platform that if the bill fails, the responsibility lies with the Democrats for failing to join Republicans in supporting this bipartisan legislation. She pointed out that the Democrats' continued demands for amendments could lead future regulatory agencies to "stifle the crypto industry." Lummis added that if the differences can be bridged, she believes the Clarity Act could pass, but this requires further compromise from the Democrats, rather than concessions from the White House. Lummis had previously stated that if the bill fails, it will be due to the Democrats. The U.S. Senate is set to hold a procedural vote on the bill next week, and Lummis warned that if it does not pass next week, there will be no realistic opportunity within this decade. The Clarity Act aims to formally delineate the responsibilities of regulatory agencies and distinguish whether digital assets are classified as securities, commodities, or stablecoins. The bill was passed by the House of Representatives last July but was shelved due to conflicts between banking lobbyists and crypto companies over customer stablecoin yield issues. A new draft circulating in July prohibits government officials from promoting or profiting from crypto, with Democrats criticizing the Trump family for venturing into this area, yet still deeming the bill insufficient and calling for amendments.

Apple faces a $2.7 billion class action lawsuit: accused of unfair application tracking rules against third-party developers, gaining improper advantages in its own advertising ecosystem

According to a report by Reuters, Apple Inc. is facing a class-action lawsuit in London, with claims amounting to £2 billion (approximately $2.7 billion). The lawsuit was filed today in the London Competition Appeal Tribunal by Ann Pope, a former senior official of the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, representing app developers.The core allegation is that Apple's "App Tracking Transparency" (ATT) feature, launched in 2021, imposes stricter restrictions on third-party developers than on its own services, giving Apple's own advertising ecosystem an unfair competitive advantage. Ann Pope stated that Apple's policies "have caused very significant harm to businesses that rely on Apple as a gatekeeper."Since its launch, the ATT feature has been a focal point of concern for global regulators for several years. Apple's official stance is that the feature is designed to allow users to control whether to permit apps to track their activities across other companies and websites.However, the plaintiffs argue that the actual enforcement of this rule has a double standard—tracking requests from third-party apps require strict pop-up authorization, while Apple's own personalized ads and services can bypass the same restrictions. This lawsuit represents the latest legal challenge Apple faces regarding its ATT policy and is the first large-scale private antitrust lawsuit initiated in the UK market against Apple's app ecosystem rules following scrutiny from regulators in the EU, the US, and several other countries.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.