Scan to download
BTC $59,768.42 +0.65%
ETH $1,589.93 +1.43%
BNB $554.54 +0.57%
XRP $1.04 +0.46%
SOL $74.23 +3.89%
TRX $0.3190 -0.83%
DOGE $0.0724 -0.62%
ADA $0.1440 +0.24%
BCH $198.67 +3.74%
LINK $7.30 +0.57%
HYPE $66.00 +6.65%
AAVE $90.83 -0.49%
SUI $0.6909 +1.57%
XLM $0.1754 +1.93%
ZEC $398.20 +6.25%
BTC $59,768.42 +0.65%
ETH $1,589.93 +1.43%
BNB $554.54 +0.57%
XRP $1.04 +0.46%
SOL $74.23 +3.89%
TRX $0.3190 -0.83%
DOGE $0.0724 -0.62%
ADA $0.1440 +0.24%
BCH $198.67 +3.74%
LINK $7.30 +0.57%
HYPE $66.00 +6.65%
AAVE $90.83 -0.49%
SUI $0.6909 +1.57%
XLM $0.1754 +1.93%
ZEC $398.20 +6.25%

india

All
Article
Flash

ZachXBT: Indian scam gang suspected of social engineering to steal coins and self-reported to the police to trace and freeze funds

"On-chain detective" ZachXBT published a case analysis stating that in a cryptocurrency asset case involving an Indian scam gang, the relevant individuals reported the case to law enforcement after their assets were frozen, drawing attention. The incident began when a user sought help, claiming that approximately 5.73 BTC (about $475,000) was frozen on Changelly in March 2025.Subsequent on-chain analysis revealed that these funds could be traced back to multiple social engineering attacks and theft cases related to Bitcoin ATMs targeting U.S. users, with a total amount involved exceeding $1 million and several elderly victims. The investigation showed that the individual provided multiple changing explanations for the source of the funds, including "loan," "boss transfer," and "investment from 2014-2015," and there were significant contradictions in the evidence chain.More concerning is that this user had previously filed a police report in India in December 2025, attempting to recover the frozen funds (case number 3207-P/2025). Subsequent on-chain evidence collection and email data analysis indicated that they might be a "mule" for transferring funds, with some bank documents inconsistent with their identity information. ZachXBT noted that such cases demonstrate that social engineering attacks and cross-border fund transfers continue to occur and remind users to avoid interacting with funds from suspicious sources to prevent triggering compliance freezes or legal risks.

India's cryptocurrency tax review exposes approximately $930 million in undeclared income, with a comprehensive strengthening of itemized reporting and cross-platform verification for the 2026 tax season

As India's tax enforcement intensifies, cryptocurrency investors face stricter reporting and compliance requirements in the 2026 tax season, with incorrect declarations potentially triggering fines and audits. Reports indicate that under current rules, cryptocurrency gains are still subject to a 30% uniform capital gains tax, and a 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is levied on transactions exceeding a certain amount, while losses cannot be offset across assets. The new Income Tax Act (2025) came into effect on April 1, 2026, but the core tax framework remains largely unchanged.In terms of reporting, investors must fill out a dedicated Schedule VDA section in the ITR-2 or ITR-3 forms and are required to record each transaction individually, including all operations such as trading, exchanging, transferring, and clearing, rather than just summarizing gains. The report emphasizes that regulatory focus has clearly escalated. The Indian tax authorities will directly obtain user-level transaction data through trading platforms, custodians, and wallet service providers, and will automatically cross-check this with reported information; discrepancies will trigger system flags and audits.Data shows that the Indian tax authorities have issued over 44,000 notices and discovered approximately 88.8 billion rupees (about 930 million USD) in unreported virtual asset income. Meanwhile, the tax department is enhancing its tracking capabilities by combining on-chain analysis tools with international data-sharing mechanisms. Additionally, starting in 2027, India will align with the OECD cryptocurrency reporting framework to achieve automatic exchange of cross-border transaction data, and overseas exchange holdings will gradually come under regulatory scrutiny.Analysis points out that common errors include misuse of reporting forms, omission of airdrop and staking income, and failure to correctly match 1% TDS records, among others. The report emphasizes that cryptocurrency tax compliance is shifting from "post-reporting" to "real-time traceability," and investors need to strengthen year-round record management.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.