nfts

Hyperliquid L2 network Elysium tweeted that it has collaborated with OpenSea to launch 8,888 commemorative NFTs, and the minting has now been fully completed.

According to Onchain Lens monitoring, Majidage (Huang Licheng) sold 3 "Bored Apes," incurring a loss of $246,000. His total investment was 188 ETH (approximately $318,730), with a total transaction amount of 32.5 ETH (approximately $72,460), resulting in a realized loss of 155.5 ETH (approximately $246,270). The details are as follows:BAYC #9770: 36 ETH → 10.5 ETHBAYC #4069: 47 ETH → 9.5 ETHBAYC #32: 105 ETH → 12.5 ETH

According to Lookonchain monitoring, "Brother Maji" Huang Licheng has faced liquidation again. In the past 4 days, he sold 15 NFTs at a loss of $505,000, and the $223,000 raised was quickly lost again.Currently, he has accumulated a loss of $909,000 on Papertrade and an accumulated loss of $37.4 million on Hyperliquid.

The multi-chain NFT data platform NFTScan stated on platform X that due to business adjustments, it will no longer provide NFT data services for Polygon and Solana.

The NFT project Robin Guards published a lengthy article titled "How Crypto Twitter KOLs Scam Projects (With Proof)" on November 2. The project claims to have collaborated with approximately 200 KOLs, totaling over 10 million followers, but ultimately sold only 200 NFTs, resulting in a conversion rate of about 0.002%. The project stated that after refusing to continue paying for related promotions, the same group of people began to label it as a scam, naming several KOLs they had previously collaborated with in the article and demanding explanations for behaviors such as purchasing fake interactions, posting in interaction groups, and disguising influence.Robin Guards stated that these KOLs initially posted positive promotions and called on their followers to participate; however, upon learning about bot posts, interaction group boosts, similar AI replies, and the sudden appearance of a large number of views without payment, they turned around and labeled the project as a scam. The project also mentioned that the account grebby began accusing it of fraud the day before, while that account itself sells fake followers and fake interaction services, and some of the named KOLs had purchased so-called smart followers and fake interactions from it. The project stated that it has attached screenshots in the article and claimed to have been in this field for 2 years, also being part of similar interaction groups.In the article, Robin Guards mentioned that these types of accounts are concerned with about $50 in rewards for each post, and real influence does not need to be purchased. The project suggested that other teams check the reach-to-view ratio, whether reply accounts are duplicated, and request actual conversion results from past activities, rather than just screenshots of views. The Robin Guards account had previously described itself as the privacy layer of Robinhood Chain, but its current profile states that it is a project that encountered fake KOLs on Crypto Twitter.

According to Talis Protocol monitoring, attackers exploited vulnerabilities in its Injective market and auction contracts to steal approximately 5,700 custodial NFTs, which were then sold through public series acquisition offers. The platform has suspended new orders and auctions on Injective and will return over 26,000 NFTs within the contracts to their original owners.New orders and auctions on other chains have also been suspended, and existing offers can still be canceled. The repaired contracts are undergoing pre-deployment review. The platform is developing a plan to return the affected NFTs to their original owners and compensate the bidders of completed offers.

Cosmos ecosystem NFT marketplace Talis Protocol stated on October 31 on X that attackers exploited vulnerabilities in its market and auction contracts on Injective, resulting in approximately 5,700 hosted NFTs being extracted and sold into public collection bids.Talis indicated that it has suspended new listings and auctions on Injective and will return over 26,000 NFTs in the contract to their holders. As a precaution, new listings and auctions on other chains have also been suspended. Please do not buy, list, or bid on Talis until the fixes are confirmed safe; users can still cancel unexecuted bids. If listings or auctions disappear, please check your wallet.The project stated that the repaired contracts are ready and are undergoing pre-deployment review, with a timeline to be announced later. The team has recorded each affected NFT, the holders before the theft, and each transaction bid, and is formulating a plan to return the NFTs to their original holders and compensate the bidders. A list of affected NFTs will be published, and please do not purchase these NFTs in the meantime.Talis also stated that it will not request wallet connections to claim any content via private messages, and a complete post-incident explanation will be released later.RootData shows that Talis Protocol was established in 2021 and completed a $2.35 million private fundraising round in November of the same year.

According to monitoring by Lookonchain, Machi (@machibigbrother) has sold over 60 NFTs in the past 6 months to raise funds for high-leverage perpetual contract trading, accumulating losses of over 1000 ETH, which is approximately 2.35 million dollars at current prices.

According to Hongxing News, Hong Kong actor and singer Anthony Wong recently revealed his investment losses. He stated that he lost a lot of money from buying NFTs. "I dare not tell my family about the money I've lost. My wife asks me every day how much I've lost, how many digits. I haven't said anything; I've lost more than I did when I was trading stocks." He also warned everyone not to follow his example in stock trading, as he was always thinking about getting rich overnight, which led to such significant losses.Anthony Wong was born on February 26, 1980, in Hong Kong, China. He was originally a swimmer and entered the entertainment industry in 2001.

Surf AI will issue 6,666 NFTs on the Robinhood Chain, containing 130,000 combinations of artistic patterns, which can collect five stocks: NVDA, SPY, META, GOOGL, and SPCX once opened. The project claims it is not financing through NFT sales; rarity is divided into Pro-1, Pro-2, Pro-3, Max, and Ultra, with quantities of 3,500, 1,800, 860, 500, and 6 respectively.Users can reveal them through an annual subscription ticket or by purchasing SURFBOARD tokens. Those who purchase an annual membership before September 16, 2026, can receive a Pro or Max NFT ticket, and renewing for the second year beforehand will grant two tickets. Once opened, the Surfboard begins to collect stocks and is irreversible, with higher levels corresponding to more stocks. Revealed Surfboards can be traded on OpenSea, with accumulated stocks belonging to the new holder; SURFBOARD tokens that have not been converted to NFTs can still be traded as usual. Upon redemption, the Surfboard is destroyed, and the user receives 95% of the accumulated stocks, with the remaining 5% distributed to all opened Surfboards.

According to on-chain information, shortly after the shutdown announcement of Abstract, a newly created address withdrew 1 million USD from Kraken and then quickly bought 25 Pudgy Penguins NFTs on the market. As of the time of writing, the wallet still holds ETH worth 766,000 USD.As of the time of writing, the floor price for Pudgy Penguins NFTs is reported at 3.3 ETH, with a 24-hour increase of 6.8%.Pudgy Penguins CEO Luca Netz stated that Abstract is gradually shutting down, and its parent company Igloo Inc. will now focus all its efforts on the development of Pudgy Penguins, Pudgy NFTs, and PENGU.

Cryptocurrency trader Ansem stated that he is quite optimistic about the real recovery of NFTs in this cycle, and art-related NFTs may see a price increase again.Ansem mentioned that what is more noteworthy is the innovation surrounding the forms of NFTs, including AI agents, ownership mechanisms, new issuance methods, and different models of NFTs combined with on-chain products. He believes that as the broader rotation of on-chain assets is still in its early stages, there may be more new applications and design explorations in the NFT field in the future.

OpenSea Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Chris Maddern posted on the X platform in response to the impact of the security incident involving Magic Eden and Limit Break, emphasizing that OpenSea's systems and smart contracts have not been affected. Currently, the affected ERC-721 NFTs have been marked on OpenSea and cannot be sold.For any newly discovered exploited NFTs, OpenSea will also automatically mark them to restrict attackers from obtaining related offers.

According to monitoring by Blockaid, Limit Break on Ethereum is currently facing ongoing attacks. The attackers are using Limit Break Payment Processor V2 to impersonate NFT holders and purchase authorized NFTs at a zero price. Currently, about 3 transactions have resulted in approximately 1.7 million dollars worth of NFTs being stolen.Blockaid reminds users who have authorized Payment Processor V2 as an NFT Operator to immediately revoke the relevant authorization. Simply canceling orders or Master Nonce will not lift this permission.

The NFT market Magic Eden appears to have a security vulnerability, with white hat hackers transferring 3,832 NFTs from hundreds of wallets.Quit, the Vice President of Blockchain at Yuga Labs, stated that this transfer is part of a white hat operation. The related NFTs are currently stored in an address starting with "0x71cF," and the assets are in a secure state. They will be returned in full once the risk is eliminated.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, 5 hours ago, a suspected address of @XXAntiWar bought 17.56 million Niu Lai worth 1.51 million dollars when the market cap of Niu Lai was 86 million dollars. Among them, one address used 1,540 BNB, worth 1.067 million dollars, to buy 12.25 million Niu Lai; another address used 645 BNB, worth 447,000 dollars, to buy 5.31 million Niu Lai. The market cap of Niu Lai today rose from a maximum of 55 million dollars to 98 million dollars.

According to The Defiant, Cole Villemain, the co-founder of the well-known NFT project Pudgy Penguins, who was voted out by the community, launched a series of 44,000 NFTs named Spritehood on Robinhood Chain on August 11, selling out in less than an hour.According to on-chain statistics of minting transactions by analyst 0xlaplaced, this sale generated approximately $1.2829 million (equivalent to about 684.28 ETH at the minting price), higher than the approximately $755,000 figure circulating during the sale, which was a snapshot taken while the sale was still ongoing. According to the statistics, the paid sale lasted about 53 minutes, during which 37,430 pieces were sold for $17 each, and 5,526 pieces were sold for $117 each. Before the paid sale began, the deploying party also distributed 1,488 pieces for free through 20 zero-price transactions.Reports indicate that the Spritehood contract itself is displayed as unverified source code on the Blockscout browser of Robinhood Chain, preventing buyers from reviewing the public code regarding its token pricing and distribution mechanism. Cole Villemain was voted out of the founding team by the Pudgy Penguins holder community in January 2022, accompanied by accusations of misappropriating project funds, but the related accusations have remained at the level of allegations, and Villemain has not been prosecuted as a result.

Forma announced on the X platform that after careful consideration, it has decided to shut down Forma Chain due to the unsustainability of operating the chain.As a transitional solution, Modularium and Forma NFT will migrate to Ethereum L1 to ensure the permanent existence of artworks and the marketplace. After the migration, NFTs will still be accessible and can be traded on OpenSea or other Ethereum marketplaces, with Modularium continuing to serve as the display platform for these collectibles.The team strongly recommends that users withdraw funds via the Forma bridge. Any funds not withdrawn in a timely manner will be manually migrated to an EVM-compatible chain to be announced later.The team emphasizes that user funds and NFTs are safe, and a specific timeline and migration steps will be announced subsequently.

According to on-chain analysis platform Lookonchain (@lookonchain), "Machibigbrother" (@machibigbrother) has once again faced liquidation. To raise funds to maintain an ETH long position, he sold Bored Ape #6801 for 8.61 ETH two hours ago, while the purchase price of the NFT three years ago was 23.5 ETH. This sale resulted in a loss of approximately 14.89 ETH (about $28,000).

According to monitoring by Lookonchain, Huang Licheng (@machibigbrother) has once again sold 3 Bored Ape NFTs, obtaining 27.42 ETH (44,000 USD), incurring a loss of 25 ETH (40,000 USD), to raise funds to increase his ETH long position.He currently holds a long position of 2,600 ETH (4.2 million USD), with a liquidation price of 1,596.69 USD.