Scan to download
BTC $59,174.83 -1.16%
ETH $1,579.76 +0.35%
BNB $549.94 -0.52%
XRP $1.04 -0.52%
SOL $73.51 +1.06%
TRX $0.3180 -1.89%
DOGE $0.0721 -0.70%
ADA $0.1441 -0.32%
BCH $199.26 +1.51%
LINK $7.25 -0.75%
HYPE $65.02 +4.21%
AAVE $89.02 -2.33%
SUI $0.6902 +0.13%
XLM $0.1786 +3.66%
ZEC $392.13 +2.02%
BTC $59,174.83 -1.16%
ETH $1,579.76 +0.35%
BNB $549.94 -0.52%
XRP $1.04 -0.52%
SOL $73.51 +1.06%
TRX $0.3180 -1.89%
DOGE $0.0721 -0.70%
ADA $0.1441 -0.32%
BCH $199.26 +1.51%
LINK $7.25 -0.75%
HYPE $65.02 +4.21%
AAVE $89.02 -2.33%
SUI $0.6902 +0.13%
XLM $0.1786 +3.66%
ZEC $392.13 +2.02%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.