BTC $63,131.97 +0.50%
ETH $1,884.30 +1.15%
BNB $606.33 +0.05%
XRP $1.00 +0.43%
SOL $75.51 +0.34%
TRX $0.3320 -0.52%
DOGE $0.0699 +0.34%
ADA $0.1801 -0.28%
BCH $202.23 -1.69%
LINK $8.84 +1.68%
HYPE $55.95 -2.73%
AAVE $86.61 -0.56%
SUI $0.6784 -0.38%
XLM $0.1597 +0.76%
ZEC $489.05 +1.13%
BTC $63,131.97 +0.50%
ETH $1,884.30 +1.15%
BNB $606.33 +0.05%
XRP $1.00 +0.43%
SOL $75.51 +0.34%
TRX $0.3320 -0.52%
DOGE $0.0699 +0.34%
ADA $0.1801 -0.28%
BCH $202.23 -1.69%
LINK $8.84 +1.68%
HYPE $55.95 -2.73%
AAVE $86.61 -0.56%
SUI $0.6784 -0.38%
XLM $0.1597 +0.76%
ZEC $489.05 +1.13%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.