Scan to download
BTC $78,592.21 -2.42%
ETH $2,214.67 -1.77%
BNB $661.04 -3.13%
XRP $1.42 -3.62%
SOL $88.03 -3.23%
TRX $0.3511 -0.55%
DOGE $0.1107 -3.29%
ADA $0.2562 -4.13%
BCH $422.39 -2.87%
LINK $9.88 -4.01%
HYPE $41.72 -8.48%
AAVE $89.80 -7.24%
SUI $1.06 -7.78%
XLM $0.1521 -4.78%
ZEC $501.45 -8.09%
BTC $78,592.21 -2.42%
ETH $2,214.67 -1.77%
BNB $661.04 -3.13%
XRP $1.42 -3.62%
SOL $88.03 -3.23%
TRX $0.3511 -0.55%
DOGE $0.1107 -3.29%
ADA $0.2562 -4.13%
BCH $422.39 -2.87%
LINK $9.88 -4.01%
HYPE $41.72 -8.48%
AAVE $89.80 -7.24%
SUI $1.06 -7.78%
XLM $0.1521 -4.78%
ZEC $501.45 -8.09%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.