Scan to download
BTC $79,152.05 -2.95%
ETH $2,229.21 -2.93%
BNB $673.77 -1.64%
XRP $1.44 -4.11%
SOL $89.29 -3.50%
TRX $0.3520 -0.55%
DOGE $0.1130 -3.04%
ADA $0.2617 -3.83%
BCH $427.08 -2.30%
LINK $10.08 -4.30%
HYPE $44.16 -1.93%
AAVE $93.27 -5.69%
SUI $1.10 -8.01%
XLM $0.1553 -4.89%
ZEC $516.87 -7.50%
BTC $79,152.05 -2.95%
ETH $2,229.21 -2.93%
BNB $673.77 -1.64%
XRP $1.44 -4.11%
SOL $89.29 -3.50%
TRX $0.3520 -0.55%
DOGE $0.1130 -3.04%
ADA $0.2617 -3.83%
BCH $427.08 -2.30%
LINK $10.08 -4.30%
HYPE $44.16 -1.93%
AAVE $93.27 -5.69%
SUI $1.10 -8.01%
XLM $0.1553 -4.89%
ZEC $516.87 -7.50%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.