BTC $80,396.46 -1.42%
ETH $2,357.21 -1.63%
BNB $731.06 -1.61%
XRP $1.27 -3.35%
SOL $101.10 -2.85%
TRX $0.3295 +0.12%
DOGE $0.0767 -3.85%
ADA $0.2066 -4.27%
BCH $274.87 -3.60%
LINK $11.52 -4.63%
HYPE $75.14 -3.77%
AAVE $140.08 -5.39%
SUI $0.9402 -5.01%
XLM $0.1687 -4.47%
ZEC $1,143.07 -6.52%
AAPL $346.91 +0.07%
AMZN $248.11 -0.78%
GOOGL $320.52 -1.02%
MSFT $522.65 +0.99%
META $641.41 -0.64%
NVDA $211.18 -1.20%
TSLA $370.64 -1.87%
SNDK $1,234.52 -4.77%
INTC $86.28 -0.66%
SPCX $146.85 -0.88%
MU $879.22 +0.61%
AMD $514.76 +0.13%
BTC $80,396.46 -1.42%
ETH $2,357.21 -1.63%
BNB $731.06 -1.61%
XRP $1.27 -3.35%
SOL $101.10 -2.85%
TRX $0.3295 +0.12%
DOGE $0.0767 -3.85%
ADA $0.2066 -4.27%
BCH $274.87 -3.60%
LINK $11.52 -4.63%
HYPE $75.14 -3.77%
AAVE $140.08 -5.39%
SUI $0.9402 -5.01%
XLM $0.1687 -4.47%
ZEC $1,143.07 -6.52%
AAPL $346.91 +0.07%
AMZN $248.11 -0.78%
GOOGL $320.52 -1.02%
MSFT $522.65 +0.99%
META $641.41 -0.64%
NVDA $211.18 -1.20%
TSLA $370.64 -1.87%
SNDK $1,234.52 -4.77%
INTC $86.28 -0.66%
SPCX $146.85 -0.88%
MU $879.22 +0.61%
AMD $514.76 +0.13%

帮人炒“泰达币”亏了十几万?台州市黄岩区人民法院:合同无效,全数返还

2021-11-20 14:39:17

链捕手消息,近日台州市黄岩法院审结一起委托合同纠纷案件,黄甲经人介绍与张乙签订了《数字货币量化委托协议书》一份,约定黄甲以个人名义转账给张乙20万元用于购买泰达币(USDT),由张乙投资运作,协议到期后保底归还黄甲合同签订时购买的等量数字货币;张乙定期向黄甲结算相应收益,合同到期时结算所委托的数字货币;协议期限为一年。然而,市场行情并未像黄甲预期的那般良好,张乙亦无法控制虚拟货币市场的行情变化,陆陆续续返还给黄甲投资款95760元,剩下的款项迟迟未能返还给,眼见投资回本无望的黄甲将张乙起诉到了法院,要求其返还投资款,并赔偿相应的利息损失。
 
台州市黄岩区人民法院裁定,本案案涉标的物本身不具有合法性,故原、被告关于该交易物的委托托管行为亦不受法律保护,因此原、被告签订的《数字货币量化委托协议书》属于无效合同。被告依无效合同取得的财产应当返还给原告,被告应返还原告剩余的104240元投资款。原告应当明知虚拟货币的投资不受国家法律所保护,而仍然委托被告进行投资,本身存在过错,故其请求赔偿利息等损失的主张于法无据,不予支持。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界