BTC $80,853.07 -1.23%
ETH $2,381.17 -1.30%
BNB $739.22 +0.17%
XRP $1.29 -2.20%
SOL $102.55 -1.87%
TRX $0.3296 +0.21%
DOGE $0.0788 -0.97%
ADA $0.2112 -2.14%
BCH $278.16 -2.04%
LINK $11.85 -3.20%
HYPE $77.18 -1.08%
AAVE $144.58 -3.05%
SUI $0.9625 -2.97%
XLM $0.1734 -2.27%
ZEC $1,168.45 -4.88%
AAPL $347.65 -0.12%
AMZN $249.00 -0.96%
GOOGL $322.08 -1.02%
MSFT $525.02 +0.94%
META $642.01 -0.78%
NVDA $211.54 -1.19%
TSLA $372.72 -0.94%
SNDK $1,242.71 -1.73%
INTC $86.96 +0.34%
SPCX $147.87 +0.22%
MU $886.20 +2.38%
AMD $519.60 +0.83%
BTC $80,853.07 -1.23%
ETH $2,381.17 -1.30%
BNB $739.22 +0.17%
XRP $1.29 -2.20%
SOL $102.55 -1.87%
TRX $0.3296 +0.21%
DOGE $0.0788 -0.97%
ADA $0.2112 -2.14%
BCH $278.16 -2.04%
LINK $11.85 -3.20%
HYPE $77.18 -1.08%
AAVE $144.58 -3.05%
SUI $0.9625 -2.97%
XLM $0.1734 -2.27%
ZEC $1,168.45 -4.88%
AAPL $347.65 -0.12%
AMZN $249.00 -0.96%
GOOGL $322.08 -1.02%
MSFT $525.02 +0.94%
META $642.01 -0.78%
NVDA $211.54 -1.19%
TSLA $372.72 -0.94%
SNDK $1,242.71 -1.73%
INTC $86.96 +0.34%
SPCX $147.87 +0.22%
MU $886.20 +2.38%
AMD $519.60 +0.83%

江苏高院:境外虚拟货币投资不受我国法律保护

2025-02-12 12:08:00

ChainCatcher 消息,据江苏高院公众号,江苏高院发布涉外商事审判典型案例,指出境外虚拟货币投资不受我国法律保护。相关案例中,新加坡公民潘某某、中国公民田某某与案外人签订了合作协议约定共同经营“MFA区块链”项目,潘某某向田某某转账 1574 万元用于购买 MFA 虚拟货币,但之后案涉虚拟账户被锁定而无法交易本金全部损失,潘某某向法院提起诉讼。

江苏高院二审认为,潘某某是新加坡公民,本案具有涉外因素,根据我国法律适用法,涉及我国金融安全以及社会公共利益的,应当直接适用我国法律法规的强制性规定,我国法律法规规定禁止虚拟货币投资。本案中当事人签订合同炒作境外虚拟货币,违反了我国金融监管领域的强制性规定,对于当事人主张的投资损失依法不予保护,由此引发的损失由当事人自行承担。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界