BTC $80,854.09 -1.01%
ETH $2,381.77 -1.00%
BNB $739.26 +0.24%
XRP $1.29 -1.85%
SOL $102.67 -1.28%
TRX $0.3295 +0.19%
DOGE $0.0788 -0.76%
ADA $0.2113 -1.67%
BCH $277.43 -2.12%
LINK $11.86 -2.52%
HYPE $77.20 -0.78%
AAVE $144.68 -2.41%
SUI $0.9639 -2.68%
XLM $0.1734 -1.93%
ZEC $1,165.84 -4.26%
AAPL $347.50 -0.07%
AMZN $249.01 -0.93%
GOOGL $321.99 -1.02%
MSFT $524.79 +1.04%
META $641.96 -0.66%
NVDA $211.54 -1.15%
TSLA $372.09 -0.99%
SNDK $1,242.04 -1.96%
INTC $86.97 +0.43%
SPCX $147.90 +0.22%
MU $885.72 +2.36%
AMD $519.64 +0.99%
BTC $80,854.09 -1.01%
ETH $2,381.77 -1.00%
BNB $739.26 +0.24%
XRP $1.29 -1.85%
SOL $102.67 -1.28%
TRX $0.3295 +0.19%
DOGE $0.0788 -0.76%
ADA $0.2113 -1.67%
BCH $277.43 -2.12%
LINK $11.86 -2.52%
HYPE $77.20 -0.78%
AAVE $144.68 -2.41%
SUI $0.9639 -2.68%
XLM $0.1734 -1.93%
ZEC $1,165.84 -4.26%
AAPL $347.50 -0.07%
AMZN $249.01 -0.93%
GOOGL $321.99 -1.02%
MSFT $524.79 +1.04%
META $641.96 -0.66%
NVDA $211.54 -1.15%
TSLA $372.09 -0.99%
SNDK $1,242.04 -1.96%
INTC $86.97 +0.43%
SPCX $147.90 +0.22%
MU $885.72 +2.36%
AMD $519.64 +0.99%

江苏高院:境外虚拟货币投资不受我国法律保护

2025-02-12 12:08:00

ChainCatcher 消息,据江苏高院公众号,江苏高院发布涉外商事审判典型案例,指出境外虚拟货币投资不受我国法律保护。相关案例中,新加坡公民潘某某、中国公民田某某与案外人签订了合作协议约定共同经营“MFA区块链”项目,潘某某向田某某转账 1574 万元用于购买 MFA 虚拟货币,但之后案涉虚拟账户被锁定而无法交易本金全部损失,潘某某向法院提起诉讼。

江苏高院二审认为,潘某某是新加坡公民,本案具有涉外因素,根据我国法律适用法,涉及我国金融安全以及社会公共利益的,应当直接适用我国法律法规的强制性规定,我国法律法规规定禁止虚拟货币投资。本案中当事人签订合同炒作境外虚拟货币,违反了我国金融监管领域的强制性规定,对于当事人主张的投资损失依法不予保护,由此引发的损失由当事人自行承担。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界